Purchase Summary

In order to access content on the FENIX Marketplace, you must have an account. You will also have access to FENIX Free updates.

The price for access is $599.00.

Account Information Already have an account? Log in here

LEAVE THIS BLANK

Payment Information We accept all major credit cards

By selecting this, I agree to receive emails from fenix.group.

You will be redirected to view the full article after purchasing. You will receive your account and payment information in a confirmation email, and can be viewed at any time in your Account.
RETURN TO HOME
$599
Basal Insulin

Thoughts on CONCLUDE (H2H Tresiba vs. Toujeo T2DM Basal-only Trial)

Here is a brief preview of this blast: Novo Nordisk presented results at EASD from CONCLUDE, its Tresiba vs. Toujeo T2DM basal-only H2H study, and announced the results in a press release. While the trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit in the primary endpoint (severe or BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemia), key secondary outcomes showed a clear benefit favoring Tresiba. It is a bit ironic that since the primary endpoint was not met, no conclusions can be made from the CONCLUDE secondary outcomes. Below, FENIX provides thoughts on the trial including a winners & losers analysis.

About The Author

Matthew Maryniak

|
President of Fenix Group International
Matthew has been a thought leader in the high-growth therapeutic areas of diabetes and cardiovascular medicine since 2006, making regular attendance at large and small CV/met scientific meetings and an architect of novel methods for assessing market opportunities. He has over a decade of experience in leading CV/met consulting engagements, is a published author in PM360 and Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, and has been quoted in The Pink Sheet on anti-thrombotics.